Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?

[john-nanog at johnpeach.com (John Peach)]

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:48:35 -0800
Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:

> William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote:
> >>> ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole
> >>> Atrivo incident of 2008.  My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being
> >>> involved, nor the provider that belongs to.
> >> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's
> >> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank
> >> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch
> >> the vitriol roll in.  There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
> > 
> > Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding
> > what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to
> > think otherwise).  Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to
> > ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo".
> > 
> 
> You should still be able to submit a ticket to SORBS, no? I was always 
> under the impression that it was "open a ticket and wait or you are 
> moved to the back of the line" with SORBS.
> 

More like "pay our ransom or FOAD". Why I never use them....

-- 
John