[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

109/8 - not a BOGON

Subject: 109/8 - not a BOGON
From: matthew at walster.org (Matthew Walster)
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:22:01 +0100

Hi there,

A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of addresses
he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.

If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you review
it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in 89/8 and 83/8
work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.

Matthew Walster

Follow-Ups:
- 109/8 - not a BOGON
  - From: shane at short.id.au (Shane Short)
- 109/8 - not a BOGON
  - From: jstuppi at cisco.com (John Stuppi (jstuppi))
- 109/8 - not a BOGON
  - From: leo.vegoda at icann.org (Leo Vegoda)
- 109/8 - not a BOGON
  - From: mpalmer at hezmatt.org (Matthew Palmer)

Prev by Date: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility
Next by Date: 109/8 - not a BOGON
Previous by thread: 32-bit AS numbers
Next by thread: 109/8 - not a BOGON
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread