[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
109/8 - not a BOGON
- Subject: 109/8 - not a BOGON
- From: jstuppi at cisco.com (John Stuppi (jstuppi))
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 07:42:56 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
The 109/8 range was removed from our ISP Ingress Prefix Filters in
version 22 (dated 6-Feb-2009):
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/cons/isp/security/Ingress-Prefix-Filter-Template
s/T-ip-prefix-filter-ingress-loose-check-v22.txt
Thanks,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Walster [mailto:matthew at walster.org]
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 7:22 AM
To: nanog at nanog.org
Subject: 109/8 - not a BOGON
Hi there,
A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of
addresses he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This
was declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January
2009.
If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you
review it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in
89/8 and 83/8 work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.
Matthew Walster