[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
- Subject: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
- From: tomb at byrneit.net (Tomas L. Byrnes)
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:26:30 -0800
- In-reply-to: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAADT0eC+Ss13TLme8r+R6s5VAQAAAAA=@iname.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]><[email protected]> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAADT0eC+Ss13TLme8r+R6s5VAQAAAAA=@iname.com>
We actively sought reciprocal secondaries, and offered and received
reciprocal query hosts, from other regional ISPs when I was CTO @ ADN.
We saw it as "strengthening the regional Internet".
So our users used CTSnet as their tertiary NS, and CTSNet used ours, FE.
Of course, not CTS/CARI and ADN are all AIS, so the point is moot.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnkblk at iname.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 7:25 PM
> To: 'Joe Abley'
> Cc: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: RE: History of 4.2.2.2. What's the story?
>
> We do. It's at our upstream provider, just in case we had an upstream
> connectivity issue or some internal meltdown that prevented those in
> the
> outside world to hit our (authoritative) DNS servers. Of course,
> that's
> most helpful for DNS records that resolve to IPs *outside* our
network.
>
> Frank
>
> ===
> <snip>
>
> For what it's worth, I have never heard of an ISP, big or small,
> deciding to place resolvers used by their customers in someone else's
> network. Perhaps I just need to get out more.
>
> Joe
>
>