[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 Prefix announcing
- Subject: IPv6 Prefix announcing
- From: mksmith at adhost.com (Michael K. Smith - Adhost)
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:17:04 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <3e67f6c1$2b23cd7f$74e5177b$@com> <[email protected]> <4B4120B1642DCF48ACA84E4F82C8E1F65B83E20FC4@EXCH> <[email protected]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Seth Mattinen [mailto:sethm at rollernet.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 12:52 PM
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Prefix announcing
>
> On 4/26/2011 09:39, Kate Gerry wrote:
> > Funny enough, some carriers actually require the 'smallest' as being /32... :(
> >
>
> This is becoming the exception now, not the rule.
>
> Last year I was fighting with Verizon about their refusal to carry /48s.
> That, together with the impasse of figuring out how to put dual stack
> IPv6 on an Ethernet port (it was delivered as IPv4 only multiple times),
> I never accepted it and went with a competitor who got it right the
> first time. However, I've had several sources tell me Verizon has since
> backpedaled and now accepts /48s.
>
> ~Seth
*> 2001:67C:120::/48 2001:504:16::1B1B 150 0 6939 701 12702 43751 6716 i
Mike