[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
- Subject: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:56:19 +0900
- In-reply-to: <CALFTrnNMqUZEkUMEmupAk4LeA_EFUVqUYhF=6fhU2U4k2PZhPg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAE+sBxgt04Myw-MY_pck6=fS52uY25LA+vttsy0iXLrvPJBrHQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnNMqUZEkUMEmupAk4LeA_EFUVqUYhF=6fhU2U4k2PZhPg@mail.gmail.com>
Ray Soucy wrote:
>> Granted that the notion of default router of IPv4 is no better
>> than that of IPv6.
>
> Please present a reasonable alternative.
According to the end to end argument, the only possible solution
to the problem, with no complete or correct alternatives, is to
let hosts directly participate in IGP activities.
See the paper by Saltzer et. al.
Masataka Ohta