[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

Subject: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 22:05:07 +0900
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAE+sBxgt04Myw-MY_pck6=fS52uY25LA+vttsy0iXLrvPJBrHQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnNMqUZEkUMEmupAk4LeA_EFUVqUYhF=6fhU2U4k2PZhPg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

>>> Granted that the notion of default router of IPv4 is no better
>>> than that of IPv6.
> 
>> Please present a reasonable alternative.
> 
> Obviously reducing down the entire DFZ to a single default route
> is a bad case of premature optimization,

Stop confusing "default router" and "default route".

						Masataka Ohta

References:
- IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
  - From: raviduggal2906 at gmail.com (Ravi Duggal)
- IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
  - From: don at bowenvale.co.nz (Don Gould)
- Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
  - From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)
- Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)

Prev by Date: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
Next by Date: subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?
Previous by thread: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
Next by thread: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread