[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
- Subject: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
- From: avitkovsky at emea.att.com (Vitkovsky, Adam)
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:27:24 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CALFTrnNVZDoO+f8nJMPwAMFkeyL+Ov_h81=PHvV0X4WAbb=aFA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAE+sBxgt04Myw-MY_pck6=fS52uY25LA+vttsy0iXLrvPJBrHQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnNMqUZEkUMEmupAk4LeA_EFUVqUYhF=6fhU2U4k2PZhPg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnNVZDoO+f8nJMPwAMFkeyL+Ov_h81=PHvV0X4WAbb=aFA@mail.gmail.com>
>... host systems should participate in IGP
>We tried that.
>It didn't scale well.
>The Internet today is very different than the Internet in 1981.
-did you? I thought CLNS with plethora of ip addresses compared to ipv4 was buried before it could be widely deployed, I was not around back than but would like to know why ES-IS did not scale well when integrated IS-IS is still used primarily for great scalability