[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CSI New York fake IPv6

Subject: CSI New York fake IPv6
From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:51:58 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> No, there are several reserved stretches of both IPv4 and DNS space
> for just such reasons. ?example.com is the most common and well known,
> but see also RFC 3330 and RFC 5737, not necessarily in that order.

See also this thread
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2011-March/034179.html from
less than two weeks ago for discussion of this in relation to IPv6.

-- 
Jeff S Wheeler <jsw at inconcepts.biz>
Sr Network Operator? /? Innovative Network Concepts

References:
- CSI New York fake IPv6
  - From: patrick at ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore)
- CSI New York fake IPv6
  - From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)

Prev by Date: CSI New York fake IPv6
Next by Date: CSI New York fake IPv6
Previous by thread: CSI New York fake IPv6
Next by thread: CSI New York fake IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread