[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
why haven't ethernet connectors changed?
- Subject: why haven't ethernet connectors changed?
- From: hcb at netcases.net (Howard C. Berkowitz)
- Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:03:09 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAO1bj=aCmCx+9KNtdqRMLvsnE0HJqyL7+LBSnVxrndBAu1X0ug@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=b4TzVWJ-VYasCeJXFDsEV5RFOmEAkAxTyK+CtpPPKaqA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <616B4ECE1290D441AD56124FEBB03D080E5E262492@mailserver2007.nyigc.globe> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbU5StiwtF56b=Qb0c2NirMKfgmdCqMY3Ctg4+abvCGpEw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAO1bj=aCmCx+9KNtdqRMLvsnE0HJqyL7+LBSnVxrndBAu1X0ug@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/23/2012 7:44 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
> On 23 December 2012 01:07, Wayne E Bouchard <web at typo.org> wrote:
>
>> They serve quite well until I get to a switch that some douchebag
>> mounted rear facing on the front posts of the rack
>
>
> I see this all the time with low-end Cisco ISR products (2... and 3...
> routers) since CIsco insist on having a "pretty" plastic fascia with their
> logo, model number, power LED etc. on the unuseful side.
Such routers have two fronts: a suit side and an operational side.
> Less experienced
> installers (being generous with my terminology) assume this is therefore
> the "front" and mount it facing on the front rails, leaving the connector
> side buried half way into the rack where only a proctologist can reach the
> plugs.
For further detail about the latter: http://f2.org/humour/songs/crs.html
>
> I use this as a gauge of experience in interviews for engineers... "Here's
> a new router and here's the rack mount ears. Show me where they go."
>
> Aled
>