[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RPKI and Trust Anchor question
- Subject: RPKI and Trust Anchor question
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 12:08:33 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAGFn2k3fU9QQTcygR9q7FJ8R-iHG0d+F0JnYsNA73AA=gre69g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CACfXSnC7nbZbTFFQtotR56VaxmZy49fQ_=LMXUS8uuM0eODdOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGFn2k3fU9QQTcygR9q7FJ8R-iHG0d+F0JnYsNA73AA=gre69g@mail.gmail.com>
Actually, ICANN had an RPKI pilot in operation back in 1996 or so. For political reasons (as far as I can tell), the RIRs refused to let ICANN/IANA play. Unless the RIRs are willing to accept ICANN/IANA as the root TA as recommended by the IAB, ICANN can't move forward.
Regards,
-drc
----
Mobile device, sorry about tpyos
On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:
> NRO, the RIRs collective, is still working on this. It's listed as an open
> action item since Q2 this CY at NRO Executive Council meetings:
> http://www.nro.net
>
> It's very unlikely that ICANN, which sees the NRO as it's address support
> organization, will move on this before NRO does.
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Marcel Plug <marcelplug at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nanog,
>>
>> Does anyone have any inside information what may be happening in the effort
>> to have a single trust anchor for RPKI? Is ICANN still working on this?
>> If so is there any timeline or published info of any kind?
>>
>> Most of the information i can find is about 2 years old.
>>
>> Any links or info of any kind would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Marcel Plug
>>