RPKI and Trust Anchor question

[barbara.roseman at icann.org (Barbara Roseman)]

I think David meant 2006, not 1996.

-Barb Roseman

On 8/5/13 12:08 PM, "David Conrad" <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:

>Actually, ICANN had an RPKI pilot in operation back in 1996 or so. For
>political reasons (as far as I can tell), the RIRs refused to let
>ICANN/IANA play. Unless the RIRs are willing to accept ICANN/IANA as the
>root TA as recommended by the IAB, ICANN can't move forward.
>
>Regards,
>-drc
>----
>Mobile device, sorry about tpyos
>
>On Aug 5, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> NRO, the RIRs collective, is still working on this. It's listed as an
>>open
>> action item since Q2 this CY at NRO Executive Council meetings:
>> http://www.nro.net
>> 
>> It's very unlikely that ICANN, which sees the NRO as it's address
>>support
>> organization, will move on this before NRO does.
>> 
>> 
>> Rubens
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Marcel Plug <marcelplug at gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Nanog,
>>> 
>>> Does anyone have any inside information what may be happening in the
>>>effort
>>> to have a single trust anchor for RPKI?  Is ICANN still working on
>>>this?
>>> If so is there any timeline or published info of any kind?
>>> 
>>> Most of the information i can find is about 2 years old.
>>> 
>>> Any links or info of any kind would be much appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Marcel Plug
>>> 
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5046 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130805/8391caf9/attachment.bin>