[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- Subject: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- From: adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk (Vitkovský Adam)
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 07:27:37 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAC1-dtkp2rjm=7tARPJNCXjky11u0S_R7xtumSzJ-M4tiNz=vg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> > Ideally, we would have a solution where an entire MPLS infrastructure
> > could be built without v4 space, demoting
> > v4 to a legacy application inside a VRF, but the MPLS standards wg
> > seems content with status quo.
>
> There is work ongoing in the MPLS IETF WG on identifying the gaps that
> various MPLS applications have so they can be prepared for IPv6 MPLS
> control and data planes.
>
> Long overdue, if you ask me, but at least it's starting to get some attention.
>
> Mark.
You mean the SR right?
adam