[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- Subject: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 09:34:01 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAC1-dtkp2rjm=7tARPJNCXjky11u0S_R7xtumSzJ-M4tiNz=vg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Monday, May 05, 2014 09:27:37 AM Vitkovský Adam wrote:
> You mean the SR right?
No, I mean:
draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-05
The draft looks at issues that need to be fixed for MPLS to
run in a single-stack IPv6 network.
Of course, there is other work that is looking at fixing
LDPv6 as well, as you know.
At the recent MPLS SDN Congress in Paris, I asked some folk
about leveraging SR to push native IPv6 support into MPLS,
but they didn't seem like that was a key application yet. So
while SR is promising, I think it's not a solution for this
particular use-case yet.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140505/4eda1476/attachment.pgp>