[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- Subject: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- From: rajiva at cisco.com (Rajiv Asati (rajiva))
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 09:27:09 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAC1-dtkp2rjm=7tARPJNCXjky11u0S_R7xtumSzJ-M4tiNz=vg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Mark,
> about leveraging SR to push native IPv6 support into MPLS,
Segment routing (SR) could/would certainly work with single-stack v6 and enable MPLS forwarding.
Cheers,
Rajiv
> On May 5, 2014, at 3:36 AM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, May 05, 2014 09:27:37 AM Vitkovský Adam wrote:
>>
>> You mean the SR right?
>
> No, I mean:
>
> draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-05
>
> The draft looks at issues that need to be fixed for MPLS to
> run in a single-stack IPv6 network.
>
> Of course, there is other work that is looking at fixing
> LDPv6 as well, as you know.
>
> At the recent MPLS SDN Congress in Paris, I asked some folk
> about leveraging SR to push native IPv6 support into MPLS,
> but they didn't seem like that was a key application yet. So
> while SR is promising, I think it's not a solution for this
> particular use-case yet.
>
> Mark.