[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- Subject: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
- From: mark.tinka at seacom.mu (Mark Tinka)
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 11:34:12 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAC1-dtkp2rjm=7tARPJNCXjky11u0S_R7xtumSzJ-M4tiNz=vg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 11:27:09 AM Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
wrote:
> Segment routing (SR) could/would certainly work with
> single-stack v6 and enable MPLS forwarding.
Certainly, but based on the Paris meeting, it was not high
up on the agenda.
So we will, likely, have to rely on other solutions and wait
for SR to catch up later.
At the moment, it seems SR is being pushed hard for PCEP as
well as SDN.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140506/4b78b329/attachment.pgp>