[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)

Subject: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
From: nanog at studio442.com.au (Julien Goodwin)
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:24:08 +1000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGTv30Ytp-kNq0ckqWc6Fc9tw-bptJO68YRp9A6TPJYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CFA35BDB.D23C8%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAMDXq5MdaJqDG2-zUWNgVsDCd0nTtZ77tYW5y74+yAz5McVA6g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On 23/05/14 11:21, Jared Mauch wrote:
> You can't cater to everyones broken network.  I can't reach 1.1.1.1 from here either, but sometimes when I travel I can, even with TTL=1.  At some point folks have to fix what's broken.

1.1.1.1 is not private IP space.

BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.0/24
Paths: (2 available, best #1)
  15169
  AS-path translation: { Google }
    edge5.Amsterdam1 (metric 20040)
      Origin IGP, metric 100000, localpref 86, valid, internal, best
      Community: Europe  Lclprf_86 Netherlands Level3_Peer Amsterdam
      Originator: edge5.Amsterdam1
  15169
  AS-path translation: { Google }
    edge5.Amsterdam1 (metric 20040)
      Origin IGP, metric 100000, localpref 86, valid, internal
      Community: Europe  Lclprf_86 Netherlands Level3_Peer Amsterdam
      Originator: edge5.Amsterdam1

(Yes ok, it doesn't respond to any packets last I checked)

I just wish Cisco wouldn't document it as a great IP address to use for
your captive portal

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

References:
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: email at edylie.net (Pui Edylie)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: tony at wicks.co.nz (Tony Wicks)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Ca By)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: hannigan at gmail.com (Martin Hannigan)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)

Prev by Date: Large DDoS, small extortion
Next by Date: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Previous by thread: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Next by thread: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread