[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IoT security

Subject: IoT security
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 05:27:50 +0900
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAP-guGVC2jkUxQTdM1UinSKxK5UPZ42FeBBF1BmUBBHGbVaWUA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWz2NJhVAmvvi=-NTom9S9bhe2hEzj4qntGR-jtiE28fg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:56:40AM -0500, William Herrin wrote:
>> Immaterial. The point is to catch vulnerable devices before they're
>> hacked.

you have a 30 second window there, maybe five minutes if you are lucky.

Follow-Ups:
- IoT security
  - From: rgolodner at infratection.com (Richard)
- IoT security
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)

References:
- IoT security
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IoT security
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- IoT security
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IoT security
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)

Prev by Date: Brainstorming acceptance issues - WAN impediment
Next by Date: IoT security
Previous by thread: IoT security
Next by thread: IoT security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread