[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IoT security

Subject: IoT security
From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:05:21 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAP-guGVC2jkUxQTdM1UinSKxK5UPZ42FeBBF1BmUBBHGbVaWUA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWz2NJhVAmvvi=-NTom9S9bhe2hEzj4qntGR-jtiE28fg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:56:40AM -0500, William Herrin wrote:
>>> Immaterial. The point is to catch vulnerable devices before they're
>>> hacked.
>
> you have a 30 second window there, maybe five minutes if you are lucky.

Hi Randy,

I'd expect a tattler kill switch to take maybe a tenth of that from
the anycast notification when the nic comes up to the ISPs response
that it is known to be vulnerable and should disconnect.

Regards,
Bill Herrin

-- 
William Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>

Follow-Ups:
- IoT security
  - From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)

References:
- IoT security
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IoT security
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- IoT security
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IoT security
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- IoT security
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)

Prev by Date: IoT security
Next by Date: IoT security
Previous by thread: IoT security
Next by thread: IoT security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread