[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IoT security

Subject: IoT security
From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 14:14:03 -0800
In-reply-to: <CAP-guGVVWQkZNSgUFrgDXx0X3+tgJM9PSaRgiY-R+mRQJsp7NA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP-guGVC2jkUxQTdM1UinSKxK5UPZ42FeBBF1BmUBBHGbVaWUA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWz2NJhVAmvvi=-NTom9S9bhe2hEzj4qntGR-jtiE28fg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGVVWQkZNSgUFrgDXx0X3+tgJM9PSaRgiY-R+mRQJsp7NA@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/07/2017 02:05 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:56:40AM -0500, William Herrin wrote:
>>>> Immaterial. The point is to catch vulnerable devices before they're
>>>> hacked.
>> you have a 30 second window there, maybe five minutes if you are lucky.
> Hi Randy,
>
> I'd expect a tattler kill switch to take maybe a tenth of that from
> the anycast notification when the nic comes up to the ISPs response
> that it is known to be vulnerable and should disconnect.

assuming that it wasn't conveniently factory installed, cf usb sticks.

Mike

References:
- IoT security
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IoT security
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- IoT security
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IoT security
  - From: rsk at gsp.org (Rich Kulawiec)
- IoT security
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- IoT security
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)

Prev by Date: IoT security
Next by Date: Data Plane open solutions available for BGP Prefix hijacking
Previous by thread: IoT security
Next by thread: IoT security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread