[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)

Subject: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 08:55:14 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGTv30Ytp-kNq0ckqWc6Fc9tw-bptJO68YRp9A6TPJYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CFA35BDB.D23C8%[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
>  I remind vendors when I talk to them, "IPv6 first, then IP classic(tm)".

Coke Classic managed to outlast NewCoke... pattern repeating?

Follow-Ups:
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: Joshua_Sholes at cable.comcast.com (Sholes, Joshua)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: bmanning at karoshi.com (manning)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: michael at supermathie.net (Michael Brown)

References:
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: email at edylie.net (Pui Edylie)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: tony at wicks.co.nz (Tony Wicks)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Ca By)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)

Prev by Date: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Next by Date: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Previous by thread: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Next by thread: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread