[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)

Subject: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
From: bmanning at karoshi.com (manning)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 06:44:26 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAL9jLabXHTxJRciu-4kRW1hBfAx5VwqBwjNgUYBV430cQ9Gd=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD6AjGTv30Ytp-kNq0ckqWc6Fc9tw-bptJO68YRp9A6TPJYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CFA35BDB.D23C8%[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLabXHTxJRciu-4kRW1hBfAx5VwqBwjNgUYBV430cQ9Gd=g@mail.gmail.com>

On 22May2014Thursday, at 5:55, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Jared Mauch <jared at puck.nether.net> wrote:
>> I remind vendors when I talk to them, "IPv6 first, then IP classic(tm)".
> 
> Coke Classic managed to outlast NewCoke... pattern repeating?

its classic for a reasonâ?¦.

/bill

References:
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: email at edylie.net (Pui Edylie)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: tony at wicks.co.nz (Tony Wicks)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- NAT IP and Google
  - From: cb.list6 at gmail.com (Ca By)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: Jason_Livingood at cable.comcast.com (Livingood, Jason)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)
- IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

Prev by Date: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Next by Date: Large DDoS, small extortion
Previous by thread: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Next by thread: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread