[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Switch for SFP+
- Subject: Switch for SFP+
- From: mjgasparini at gmail.com (Mauro Gasparini)
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:50:32 -0300
- In-reply-to: <321400719.1156.1589555115329.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
- References: <CA+LTh5VEWyKYNkQv7-2V+f9ojvtMRXzA6ptJzEiC4WOR1CEy=Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CA+LTh5U_9mCZA=FtZ42-eXOF5EY96kv=MoeHXSfkmESRTGrGzA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <321400719.1156.1589555115329.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
Yes, cpu loads a little more only when you are logged. The rest of the
time is the same.
El 15/5/20 a las 12:05, Mike Hammett escribió:
> It doesn't matter whether you use Winbox, web interface, or CLI, the
> same configuration capabilities exist.
>
> The determination is how you configure it, what version of RouterOS
> you have, and what the hardware you have is capable of. The CRS3xx
> series are the easiest to configure, with the older CRS and switch
> chips in various other products of theirs getting progressively more
> difficult and more limited in hardware-accelerated features.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"Alain Hebert" <ahebert at pubnix.net>
> *To: *nanog at nanog.org
> *Sent: *Friday, May 15, 2020 8:03:13 AM
> *Subject: *Re: Switch for SFP+
>
> Â Â Â Hi,
>
> Â Â Â Mikrotik is a decent product and I'm always amazed at their
> features set, but...
>
> Â Â Â Using the UI to configuring the switch will punt too much traffic
> toward the CPU. However, it is possible to configure the switch
> fabric with the cli and attain the desired results.
>
> Â Â Â It does not compare to a JNP QFX5100 or a Extreme Network x650,
> x670... etc.
> -----
> Alain Hebertahebert at pubnix.net
> PubNIX Inc.
> 50 boul. St-Charles
> P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
> Tel: 514-990-5911http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
> On 2020-05-14 15:11, Adam Thompson wrote:
>
> Have you actually looked at Mikrotik switches? I don't like the
> OS, but the hardware does what you want it to.
>
> https://mikrotik.com/products/group/switches?filter&s=c&r={%22sfp_plus_interface%22:{%22s%22:%223%22,%22e%22:%2224%22}}#!
>
> If necessary, buy your SFP modules from FS.com and get them coded
> as Mikrotik modules at the factory - that's what we do for Cisco,
> Brocade, Juniper, Extreme, etc.
>
> Even the top-of-the-line Mikrotik only costs US$899.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> *Adam Thompson*
> Consultant, Infrastructure Services
> [MERLIN LOGO]
> 100 - 135 Innovation Drive
> Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
> (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only)
> athompson at merlin.mb.ca <mailto:athompson at merlin.mb.ca>
> www.merlin.mb.ca <http://www.merlin.mb.ca/>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces at nanog.org> on behalf of Mauro
> Gasparini <mjgasparini at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 14, 2020 8:46:21 AM
> *To:* Mehmet Akcin
> *Cc:* nanog
> *Subject:* Re: Switch for SFP+
> Thank you. The problem is that to get a price lower than U$D 3000
> I have to resort to a used device.
>
> El 14/5/20 a las 01:08, Mehmet Akcin escribió:
>
> Used Juniper QFX5100-48T will do it. Probably overkill but you
> can grab one cheap @ebay
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 16:36 Mauro Gasparini
> <mjgasparini at gmail.com <mailto:mjgasparini at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Good afternoon.
>
> I'm looking for a switch with the following capabilities:
> . transport for more than 20 gbps
> . link aggregation LACP
> . slots for SFP+
> . seamlessly when trunking vlans through the link aggregation.
>
> And essentially that doesn't exceed US$D 2000 and is
> compatible with
> 10GBASE-ER and/or 10GBASE-ZR modules that are not from the
> vendor itself
> (e.g. SPFs: Huawei, Mikrotik, Sumitomo, OEMs).
>
> If any of you have a good experience with a device that
> meets these
> requirements (which are minimal with the exception of
> price and
> compatibility) ?
>
> Regards.
> Mauro Gasparini
>
> --
> Mehmet
> +1-424-298-1903
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20200515/3065553a/attachment.html>